Optimizing RIRS in Complex Renal Anatomy: A Comparative study of Tip-Flexible Suction versus Conventional Ureteral Access Sheath
Ovidiu-Cătălin Nechita, Daniel Liviu Bădescu, Cosmin-George Radu, Cristian-Valentin Toma, Cristian-Sorin Sima, Ionuţ Diţescu, George Sabin Popescu, Justin Aurelian, George Daniel Rădăvoi, Bogdan Geavlete, Viorel JingaOriginal article, no. 1, 2026
Article DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.3190
Background/Objectives: Managing kidney stones in patients with congenital renal anomalies - such as horseshoe kidney or ectopic kidney - presents unique challenges for endourologists. In these anatomically complex cases, standard ureteral access can be difficult, and pressure management becomes critical. Suction-assisted ureteral access sheaths have emerged as a promising solution, but clinical data in this population remain limited. This study evaluates whether using a tip-flexible suction UAS improves outcomes in retrograde intrarenal surgery compared to conventional access.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients with confirmed renal anomalies and stones sized 2-4 cm who underwent RIRS at two academic centers between October 2022 and December 2024. Patients were grouped based on the type of UAS used: suction-assisted (TFS-UAS) or conventional (T-UAS). Surgical and postoperative outcomes, including stone-free rate (SFR), complication profile, operative time, and hospital stay, were compared.
Results: The TFS-UAS group showed a higher 30-day SFR (94.3%) compared to the conventional group (81.3%), although the difference was not statistically significant. Operative time was longer with TFS-UAS (p 0.001), but this was offset by a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.003). No major differences were seen in complication rates.
Conclusions: Using a suction-assisted UAS during RIRS in patients with congenital renal anomalies offers notable clinical benefits. Primarily, it increases the chance of removing all stone fragments and often results in a shorter, easier recovery. While this technique may increase procedural time, the overall advantages, such as improved success rates and easier recovery, typically justify the additional time.
Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 67 patients with confirmed renal anomalies and stones sized 2-4 cm who underwent RIRS at two academic centers between October 2022 and December 2024. Patients were grouped based on the type of UAS used: suction-assisted (TFS-UAS) or conventional (T-UAS). Surgical and postoperative outcomes, including stone-free rate (SFR), complication profile, operative time, and hospital stay, were compared.
Results: The TFS-UAS group showed a higher 30-day SFR (94.3%) compared to the conventional group (81.3%), although the difference was not statistically significant. Operative time was longer with TFS-UAS (p 0.001), but this was offset by a shorter hospital stay (p = 0.003). No major differences were seen in complication rates.
Conclusions: Using a suction-assisted UAS during RIRS in patients with congenital renal anomalies offers notable clinical benefits. Primarily, it increases the chance of removing all stone fragments and often results in a shorter, easier recovery. While this technique may increase procedural time, the overall advantages, such as improved success rates and easier recovery, typically justify the additional time.
Keywords: RIRS, suction-assisted UAS, congenital renal anomalies, kidney stones, flexible ureteroscopy, intrarenal pressure, horseshoe kidney, ectopic kidney, ADPKD
