Comparative Study of Early Postoperative Complications: Thoracic Anastomosis vs Cervical Anastomosis - in Esophageal Replacement with Gastric Graft
Ciprian Bolca, Mihai Dumitrescu, Georgiana Fotache, Radu Stoica, Genoveva Cadar, Ioan CordoşOriginal article, no. 1, 2018
Article DOI: 10.21614/chirurgia.113.1.95
Gastric pull-up is the most commonly used procedure for esophageal replacement in both malignant and benign conditions. In our article we compare the differences in mortality and morbidity between thoracic anastomosis and cervical anastomosis during gastric pull-up. The study group comprised of 126 patients 58 patients (56%) with cervical anastomosis and 68 patients (64%) with thoracic anastomosis.
The overall mortality in the study group was 5.55% (7 patients), while the overall morbidity was higher at 28%. There were no significant differences between the two subgroups regarding mortality and morbidity, although the rate of anastomotic leakage was higher in the cervical subgroup (13.8% vs 1.5%). We recommend performing thoracic anastomosis during gastric pull-up whenever the location of the lesion allows it, since the procedure is safe, relatively easy to master and it shortens operating time by excluding the cervical approach.
The overall mortality in the study group was 5.55% (7 patients), while the overall morbidity was higher at 28%. There were no significant differences between the two subgroups regarding mortality and morbidity, although the rate of anastomotic leakage was higher in the cervical subgroup (13.8% vs 1.5%). We recommend performing thoracic anastomosis during gastric pull-up whenever the location of the lesion allows it, since the procedure is safe, relatively easy to master and it shortens operating time by excluding the cervical approach.
Keywords: intrathoracic esophagogastric anastomosis, cervical esophagogastric anastomosis, postesophagectomy complications
